🤖 AI benchmark: hit-rate of 7 models

Prematch En directo (in-play)

Seven external AI models (Hermes contour) independently analyze the same partidos — predicting the resultado (1X2), total (Más de/Menos de), both equipos to marcador (BTTS) and the exact marcador. Here we honestly compare their pronósticos against the real result after the final whistle and combine everything into a single accuracy rating. An informational and analytical snapshot, not betting advice.

⚠️ Data is still accumulating — counting starts from 09.07.2026, so all models are compared on the same events (early test pronósticos are excluded). The sample is still small and not representative. Right now the snapshot holds 115 partido(es), 472 settled AI pronósticos (Volleyball). The figures below are N, not «a percentage you can trust»: the more partidos are played out, the more reliable the snapshot becomes. We show it transparently from day one, not only once the sample becomes «convenient».

Todos los deportes Football Tennis Basketball Volleyball Hockey Tabla tennis

Leaderboard · Volleyball

Model	N (settled)	1X2	Exact marcador	Composite accuracy
Kimi	63	65.1%(41/63)	31.9%(15/47)	50.9%(56/110)
ChatGPT	18	66.7%(12/18)	18.2%(2/11)	48.3%(14/29)
Claude	94	64.9%(61/94)	20.5%(15/73)	45.5%(76/167)
Google AI	120	65.0%(78/120)	20.0%(24/120)	42.5%(102/240)
DeepSeek	13	76.9%(10/13)	7.7%(1/13)	42.3%(11/26)
Qwen	82	69.5%(57/82)	7.9%(6/76)	39.9%(63/158)
GLM 5.2	82	65.9%(54/82)	11.0%(9/82)	38.4%(63/164)

grey — sample <5, not representative; «—» — the model has not made a settled pronóstico yet.

Composite accuracy — the share of correct pronósticos en all mostrado mercados together: (sum of correct pronósticos) ÷ (sum of all settled pronósticos) en the mercados 1X2 + Exact marcador. Each mercado-pronóstico weighs equally. This is hit-rate, not profitability — for money/ROI by model see /ai-agent. «Exact marcador» — the full final marcador was guessed correctly (H and A matched); pronósticos with no recognized marcador do not count toward the denominator.

Composite model rating · all mercados · Volleyball

Bar height = the model's composite accuracy en all applicable mercados on the current sample. Sorted from best to worst.

50.9% (56/110)

Kimi 2.6

48.3% (14/29)

GPT 5.5

45.5% (76/167)

Opus 4.8

42.5% (102/240)

Gemini 3.5 Flash

42.3% (11/26)

DeepSeek V4 Pro

39.9% (63/158)

Qwen 3.7 Plus

38.4% (63/164)

GLM 5.2

Bars are AI models by version; grey/dimmed — sample <5, not representative. The snapshot is informational, not betting advice.

Accuracy by mercado · Volleyball

Where each model is strong: one mini-bar per applicable mercado, with the percentage and (hits/sample).

Kimi Composite 50.9%

1X2

65.1% (41/63)

Exact marcador

31.9% (15/47)

ChatGPT Composite 48.3%

1X2

66.7% (12/18)

Exact marcador

18.2% (2/11)

Claude Composite 45.5%

1X2

64.9% (61/94)

Exact marcador

20.5% (15/73)

Google AI Composite 42.5%

1X2

65.0% (78/120)

Exact marcador

20.0% (24/120)

DeepSeek Composite 42.3%

1X2

76.9% (10/13)

Exact marcador

7.7% (1/13)

Qwen Composite 39.9%

1X2

69.5% (57/82)

Exact marcador

7.9% (6/76)

GLM 5.2 Composite 38.4%

1X2

65.9% (54/82)

Exact marcador

11.0% (9/82)

The model's favorite by 1X2 = the max of P1/X/P2 in its probabilities; for sports without a empate (tennis, volleyball, etc.) the «X» option doesn't participate. grey — sample <5, not representative. Not betting advice.