🤖 AI benchmark: hit-rate of 7 models

Prematch En directo (in-play)

Seven external AI models (Hermes contour) independently analyze the same partidos — predicting the resultado (1X2), total (Más de/Menos de), both equipos to marcador (BTTS) and the exact marcador. Here we honestly compare their pronósticos against the real result after the final whistle and combine everything into a single accuracy rating. An informational and analytical snapshot, not betting advice.

⚠️ Data is still accumulating — counting starts from 09.07.2026, so all models are compared on the same events (early test pronósticos are excluded). The sample is still small and not representative. Right now the snapshot holds 10 partido(es), 19 settled AI pronósticos (Hockey). The figures below are N, not «a percentage you can trust»: the more partidos are played out, the more reliable the snapshot becomes. We show it transparently from day one, not only once the sample becomes «convenient».

Leaderboard · Hockey

Model N (settled) 1X2 Doble oportunidad (1X) Total goles BTTS Exact marcador Composite accuracy
Google AI
10 80.0%(8/10) 80.0%(8/10) 60.0%(6/10) 80.0%(8/10) 0.0%(0/10) 55.0%(22/40)
Claude
9 66.7%(6/9) 66.7%(6/9) 66.7%(6/9) 77.8%(7/9) 0.0%(0/9) 52.8%(19/36)
DeepSeek
0
ChatGPT
0
Qwen
0
Kimi
0
GLM 5.2
0

grey — sample <5, not representative; «—» — the model has not made a settled pronóstico yet.

Doble oportunidad (1X) — the same pronóstico counts as a victoria if the chosen side won or the partido drew. Of the 1X2 losses in football/hockey: 0 draws, 5 underdog (total settled 1X2 pronósticos in these sports: 19, double chance combined 73.7% (14/19)). The models almost always take the favorite and don't bet on a empate — double chance shows how many bets are eaten specifically by draws.

Composite accuracy — the share of correct pronósticos en all mostrado mercados together: (sum of correct pronósticos) ÷ (sum of all settled pronósticos) en the mercados 1X2 + Total goles + BTTS + Exact marcador. Each mercado-pronóstico weighs equally. This is hit-rate, not profitability — for money/ROI by model see /ai-agent. Total: a push (marcador exactly en la línea) is excluded from the denominator. BTTS is checked against whether both equipos scored. «Exact marcador» — the full final marcador was guessed correctly (H and A matched); pronósticos with no recognized marcador do not count toward the denominator. Doble oportunidad (1X): a pronóstico counts as a victoria if the chosen side won OR it was a empate — it accounts for frequent draws that «eat» bets on the favorite. This metric is informational and is not included in composite accuracy.

Composite model rating · all mercados · Hockey

Bar height = the model's composite accuracy en all applicable mercados on the current sample. Sorted from best to worst.

55.0% (22/40)
Gemini 3.5 Flash
52.8% (19/36)
Opus 4.8
DeepSeek V4 Pro
sin datos
GPT 5.5
sin datos
Qwen 3.7 Plus
sin datos
Kimi 2.6
sin datos
GLM 5.2
sin datos

Bars are AI models by version; grey/dimmed — sample <5, not representative. The snapshot is informational, not betting advice.

Accuracy by mercado · Hockey

Where each model is strong: one mini-bar per applicable mercado, with the percentage and (hits/sample).

Google AI Composite 55.0%
1X2
80.0% (8/10)
Total goles
60.0% (6/10)
BTTS
80.0% (8/10)
Exact marcador
0.0% (0/10)
Claude Composite 52.8%
1X2
66.7% (6/9)
Total goles
66.7% (6/9)
BTTS
77.8% (7/9)
Exact marcador
0.0% (0/9)
DeepSeek Composite —
1X2
Total goles
BTTS
Exact marcador
ChatGPT Composite —
1X2
Total goles
BTTS
Exact marcador
Qwen Composite —
1X2
Total goles
BTTS
Exact marcador
Kimi Composite —
1X2
Total goles
BTTS
Exact marcador
GLM 5.2 Composite —
1X2
Total goles
BTTS
Exact marcador

The model's favorite by 1X2 = the max of P1/X/P2 in its probabilities; for sports without a empate (tennis, volleyball, etc.) the «X» option doesn't participate. grey — sample <5, not representative. Not betting advice.